Tools for Intergenerational Communication: Welcome to the 3rd Conversation

Megan Gerhardt • July 11, 2024

Need a practical way to improve your generational communication in the workplace? Let me introduce one of my favorite tools: The 3rd Conversation.


Here is how to use my 3rd Conversation tool to improve intergenerational communications. This involves using some of the Gentelligence® Power Questions (if you don’t have these, you can add your email here and they will automatically be sent to you) and the 4 Gentelligence ®Practices as well (here’s a quick clip from one of my webinars if you need a refresher on those practices):

Let’s take a recent example from my own leadership experience. I sent my team (composed of primarily twenty-somethings, mainly Gen Z) what I felt was a clear and direct email sharing information and asking for a response. After several days, very few of my team members responded with what I needed.

Gentelligence® Practice #1: Identifying Assumptions and #2: Adjusting the Lens were critical to use here.

My initial assumption was that my team hadn’t prioritized my request and was being disrespectful, leading to resentment and frustration on my part.


1st Conversation (taking place in our team group text as I know they respond to that):  “

Hello, team–I sent an important email several days ago, and very few people have responded with the information I needed. Can you please send what was requested by the end of today, and can you also please help me understand why there were so few responses?”

In this case, I did receive the info I needed by the end of that day. One or two people responded to the text, apologizing and saying, “I’m sorry, I haven’t checked my email in several days; I’ll do it now!” This alone was eye-opening. As someone who has a norm of checking my work email at least once an hour, it was unthinkable to me that someone could go several DAYS without checking it.

Were they maliciously avoiding their email in an effort to thwart our productivity? Most likely not; that goes against everything I know about my team members. Instead, as digital natives, they have many communication channels they use. In our case, my team didn’t view email as a priority or a preferred way to communicate, preferring faster and more informal channels. When they did check their email, there were so many messages stacked up that some fell through the cracks. Using that Gentelligence® Power Question (can you help me understand?) resulted in some meaningful learning for me about their communication norms and habits.



2nd Conversation: 

“Fascinating, I check my email so often (at least once an hour) that it seems unthinkable to me that others could go days without doing so. I assumed you all checked email regularly, and I tend to use it for more formal and important requests. When I don’t get a response, I get pretty frustrated, and in this case, it ended up almost causing us to miss an important deadline because I didn’t have the information I needed from all of you.”


The second conversation is such an important one, mainly because there is often a presumption that improving generational dynamics means one generation is somehow forced to adjust to the norm of another, whether that is older people feeling pressure to forgo existing ways of working or communicating to placate the youngest generations, or younger generations submitting to the way things have always been done due to organizational policies or norms that may or may not still be effective.  Neither of these is Gentelligent. This is why we need the Third Conversation.


3rd Conversation:

This is where we bring in Gentelligence® Practices #3 (Strengthen Trust) and #4 (Expanding the Pie). Now that we have learned more about where all generations involved are coming from in this communication dilemma, we can move forward with a smarter intergenerational conversation about where to go next. The key element of the 3rd conversation is to remember (or reinforce) that everyone is on the same “side”, working toward the same mission as a team. Center that as the beginning of the third conversation.


Here’s a script to start with:

Me (age 47, avid email user, would like everyone to respond to my requests in a timely manner): “I think we’ve uncovered some important insights on the way we use different communication channels. Can we agree that we need to come up with a clear strategy for our future communications that ensures we all see the messages and are responding in a timeframe that allows us to meet our mission?”

Team: “Yes!” (let’s just pretend the team is amazingly agreeable and rationale)

Me: “Great. Given that is our shared goal, I’d love to hear how you think we should approach this. I have some thoughts, but I am open to your suggestions. You all seem to prefer channels other than email. Can you help me understand why you prefer those?”

(Note: “How would you approach this?” is a Gentelligence® Power Question designed to help Expand the Pie, and then we see that ever-handy “Can you help me understand…? surface again).


Team: Shares the benefits of Slack or GroupMe over email (e.g. speed).

Me: “Interesting. I’ve struggled using Slack, it’s not intuitive to me. Would one of you be willing to sit down with me for 20 minutes and walk me through some of the things I’m not enjoying? Maybe I just need more practice with it.” (Note: this takes some confidence as a leader to be vulnerable about places we may need to learn or upskill)

Team: (feels respected and valued for their unique expertise, happy to be heard and allowed input) “Yes, of course.”

Me: “Okay, how about this: after I have some additional training, our team will exclusively use Slack for 30 days for all communications. Let’s meet in a month to debrief and see how it’s going. If I still have concerns, I will ask that you then be willing to try a different approach until we find one that works for all of us.”


Give it a Try

That’s just an example, but there are all kinds of important team and leadership dynamics taking place under that simple conversation: mutual respect, vulnerability, increasing engagement, and openness to a learning/growth mindset. Slack might be a disaster and I might still really hate it (I do hate Slack), but I’m willing to admit I may just not be used to it or have taken the time to explore it’s features (note: this is not suggesting a lack of tech-savvy from older generations, see my CNN article on how different ages rely on different kinds of intelligence).

Give the 3rd Conversation a try. I’d love to hear how it goes!


By Megan Gerhardt April 10, 2025
(hint: one works, the other doesn't).
By Megan Gerhardt March 25, 2025
Here's the thing about water.
diverse students
By Megan Gerhardt February 9, 2025
Is a multigenerational workforce an opportunity or a threat? It might be up to HR. Research is clear on this: it depends on how that age diversity is managed and the workplace culture that surrounds it. Really. That is the linchpin on all of this, which means it’s entirely up to your organization to do what it takes to turn what most see as frustration into an incredibly valuable human capital asset.
seveal yard sticks together
By Megan Gerhardt January 5, 2025
The phrase “milestones of adulthood” paints maturity as an objective concept anchored in the rites of passage of marrying, purchasing a home, and having children. Yes, for past generations, those have been common benchmarks that occur as one passes through life, but the article is based on what I consider a number of flawed premises. First, the assumption that not checking those boxes represents some personal failure and symbolizes a lack of maturity. Second, the assumption we are anchored to a static definition of growing up and adulthood.
outline of a lightening bolt on a piece of paper on a clipboard with moody desk lamp lighting
By Megan Gerhardt November 19, 2024
My latest is a simple reframe, a tactic to help with our second Gentelligence practice, Adjusting the Lens. I try to avoid scripts, as there’s no one best way to lead or manage people, regardless of generation. But in the spirit of jumpstarting a smarter intergenerational conversation, I present a few Gentelligence phrases for you to try instead of judgment.
No vacancy
By Megan Gerhardt October 31, 2024
If you don’t want to hire Gen Z (that’s an entire generation made up of 69.3 million people in the United States alone) then I’m not sure what the talent strategy is here. Skip over 15 years of workforce? Is the plan to wait for the next generation because you don’t like this one?
fingers pointing at a Z
By Megan Gerhardt September 28, 2024
The norms Gen Z is bringing to the workplace are a product of many interacting realities, not the least of which was a global pandemic that impacted education, development, and upended workplace practices everywhere. This is our first generation to begin their careers in a hybrid/remote/post-COVID/mid-AI world of work. Do they have things to learn and improve upon? Of course. Is name calling and alienating them a good way to build the trust needed to teach them? Again, no.
green postit notes with happy and sad faces drawn on them.
By Megan Gerhardt September 4, 2024
Here’s the most practical generational expertise I can offer: if you want collaboration and learning across generations, you must build a workplace culture that supports it.
text conversation bubbles
By Megan Gerhardt July 7, 2024
Never before has my role as generational translator been as important as it is at this moment. Right now, your Gen Z employee may be panicking that they have somehow messed up. Questioning their career future. All because we included a PERIOD in a text message. That’s right. If you are Over 30, you must learn what I learned yesterday: when you use a period in your texts, Gen Z finds this “harsh”, “scary”, and “passive aggressive”.
Vintage drawing of the characters of the wizard of OZ
By Megan Gerhardt March 22, 2024
Many of us in older generations will recognize this sentiment, not just from that classic Wizard of Oz, but as the prevailing management philosophy as we began our careers. Whether it was decisions made above our pay grade or an understood workplace norm that it wasn’t yet our place to question the status quo, the tradition of passively accepting even the most dysfunctional practices as “just the way things were done” was deeply embedded.
More Posts